Blue Dog oil on panel 10″x8″. I found this hilarious 70’s bank. I like that it is so anthropomorphic, it plays back and forth between a deadpan, almost documentary still life and a character that begs for an emotional connection.
Output
In my studio I will work on several paintings at once, I don’t go back and forth between paintings, I really work on several paintings at a time. With practice, I have trained my ear muscles to gently grasp a brush and apply paint. So between my ears and my belly button I am able to sling a lot of paint. This degree of output makes it especially necessary to maintain a high degree of concentration so I will burn some sandalwood incense, put the Enya or Maybe some John Tesh on in the background and then I tantric paint for sometimes two or three hours in a row un-inturupted. Exhilarating!
Smoking Monkey
New Orleans
Sand Art
Hip-Hop Lincoln
Washington Monument
“Washington Monument” oil on panel 7″x5″. This is kind of a recurring theme for me. How is an item transformed by being painted? This is obviously a campy souvenir that has been recreated in paint, what ultimately is the subject? Is it the rather loaded symbol or the illusion of volume and weight? In other words, can a bad work of art become a better work of art simply by painting it? I tend to think so, but it is a funny line to walk. I think it is illustrated even more dramatically in “Broken Neon” and “Still life,Still” life where little is added contextually.
In both paintings, if the illusion is successful it should appear that I have added nothing to the original objects. They represent, as well as I am able, objects I wouldn’t hang in my home but become transformed by being re-presented. If nothing else I think they are really funny paintings.








